artikel •   Emilio Del Giudice, V. Elia, E. Napoli and Alberto Tedeschi


Foreword to this article - by Alberto Tedeschi

The considerable contribution made by modern quantum physics to the understanding of life’s mechanisms, and how the properties of water function and affect all living organisms is one of the most important breakthroughs in recent history of sciene.
All over the world many researchers (in particular from Israel, Russia, USA and Italy) have developed “special waters” that have singular characteristics so that they can be considered similar to the real “biological water” of the living systems. In Italy a team lead by Prof. Emilio Del Giudice (INFN) and Alberto Tedeschi (WHITE HB) invented a “special biological water”. The unique value of this water is its “supercoherence” state, a coherence spanning all the coherence domains (CD) throughout water, that is one of the the most important characteristic of a healthy living organism. This article describes some features of the biological water.
All HeavyLight devices use WHITE HB technology which activates this “supercoherence” state found in the biological water of healthy living organisms.




E. Del Giudice* INFN, Milano, Italy and IIB, Neuss, Germany

V. Elia, E. Napoli, Department of Chemistry, "Federico II" University, Napoli, Italy

A. Tedeschi, WHITE HB, Milano, Italy

     * corresponding author



It is shown that coherent electrodynamic of water molecules produces extended regions where the chemical activity of biomolecules is governed in a selective way by a code based on frequency resonance. Coherence Domains of water act as devices able to collect low grade energy in the environment and transform it into high grade energy able to produce electronic excitations

1. introduction

Water is the most important constituent of all living organisms (70% of the total mass and 99% of all molecules ).Other bio-molecules, proteins, fats, sugars, vitamins, salts, which are usually considered the only molecules playing a remarkable role in molecular biology  make up only 1% of the total. So, biological activity is assumed to involve 1% of all molecules only.

What is then the role of water? Is it possible that 99% of all bio-molecules are necessary only as a solvent where the “ really essential” bio- molecules enact all productive activity?

The driving and regulatory role of water in governing the biochemical activity has begun to be recognized in recent times (Voiekv, 2007).

In order to unravel this puzzle, we should take another enigma into account, that is the existence of biochemical codes (Barbieri, 2004). Apart from the living matter or more generally far from catalysts, molecules are usually subjected to a polygamous regime; each bio- molecule can interact with many others thus producing a great number of reactions. In living matter, instead, bio- molecules live inside each particular biochemical cycle in a monogamous condition ( at least within  definite time intervals), that is a bio- molecule interacts with only well- defined partners, and  ignoring the other bio-molecules, with which interaction would have been possible in empty space. Living matter therefore produces a “context” which is capable of preventing a great number of chemical interactions, which would theoretically be possible. The possibility of molecular interactions is governed by biochemical codes ( the genetic code is the most widely known among them) to which  particular biological processes correspond. Within the world of bio-molecules there are thus the prerequisites for communication. Indeed, biochemical cycles are open and capable of reacting against new influences. In this way all the codes build up and adopt flexible features, which are typical of a language.

The emergence of these biochemical codes from the dynamics of matter is undoubtedly the main problem of biology.

2.  recent results on liquid water

Recent studies (Del Giudice et al. ,1988; Arani et al. , 1996; Preparata, 1995; Del Giuduce, Preparata, 1998, Zheng et al., 2006; Del Giudice, Tedeschi, 2008) on water shed light on this puzzle and simultaneously contribute to the solution of the first enigma, that is what the role of water is in all living organisms. The following properties of all liquids (including water) have been shown as valid:

  1. below a critical temperature and above a critical density gas molecules, which are independent of each other and only prone to interact through collisions, experience a phase transition and produce a coherent state, which is characterized by a common oscillation rhythm of all constituents within a region of the space called “coherence domain” (CD).

  2. the coherent oscillation that sets in the gas- liquid phase transition is the fluctuation of the clouds of the electrons of the single molecules between two different configurations. The fluctuation takes place with the same rhythm for all the molecules of the CD and it is tuned with the oscillation of an electromagnetic field within the CD, whose existence is connected in turn with the existence of the coherent oscillation of the electronic clouds of the molecules. Molecules and electromagnetic field oscillate with the same frequency and the wavelength of the electromagnetic field sets the diameter of the CD, which in the case of water amounts to a tenth of micrometer.

  3. the oscillation frequency of the electromagnetic field within the CD is lower than the frequency of a field that has the same wavelength in the vacuum. For this reason, in accordance with electrodynamics laws (Preparata, 1995) , the field of the CD cannot leave the CD and be irradiated outwards.

  4. the energy of a molecule in the coherent state is lower than the energy of the same molecule when it is in the gas state. The difference is known as “ energy gap”. Indeed the sum of the excitation energies of the molecules which are necessary to produce their oscillation and of the energy of the electromagnetic field of the CD is less than the interaction energy between the molecules and the electromagnetic field. The latter must be subtracted from the former, so that the energetic balance is negative. A coherent state is thus produced through a loss of energy to the outside. On the contrary a CD is destroyed if it receives a higher amount of energy than the energy gap.

  5. when the coherent state comes into contact with an external environment which is characterised by a given absolute temperature T, it is subject to collisions with the external molecules which can deprive the coherent state of a fraction of its constituents. Therefore any given value for T there will correspond to a fraction Fc (T) of molecules in the coherent state and a fraction Fnc (T) of “non-coherent” molecules that float in the empty spaces between the various CDs: Fc (T)+ Fnc (T)= 1.

  6. in a certain mass of liquid there is a huge number of CDs. The state of minimum energy which is the state spontaneously adopted by any natural object is possible when the CDs are closely packed. In other words, they touch each other leaving narrow spaces in which the non- coherent fraction of the liquid circulates and where possible solutes are likely to be found.

  7. giving a CD a certain amount of energy that is inferior to the energy gap cannot produce the expulsion of the molecules. On the contrary, it produces energetically excited states of the CD. As in the coherent domain there are no collisions (molecules move like dancers in a corps de ballet, not like a crowd), these states cannot decay in a diffusive way and consequently have a very long life : they fade only when their substratum, that is the coherence domain is removed. Moreover, the energy release from the outside can determine a slight relative distancing of the CDs, so that a certain CD can be totally surrounded by a thin layer of non- coherent fluid. All the aforesaid properties are valid for all liquids.

As to water the coherent oscillation carried out by each molecule takes place between a fundamental state where the electrons are strongly bound ( an energy that amounts to 12.60 electronvolts ( eV) is necessary to expel an electron, thus to ionise a molecule) and an excited state which has an excitation energy that amounts to 12.06 eV. So, when the molecule is in the excited state of its coherent oscillation, a small amount of energy as (12.60- 12.06) = 0.54 eV is enough to free an electron.. The coherent state of water has a much higher tendency to yield electrons than the non- coherent state, which actually has no such attitude, rather it tends to capture one extra, while producing a H2O- ion. The energetic barrier that refrains the electrons within the CD is sufficiently small to allot a significant probability to a typically quantum phenomenon, the so- called “quantum tunnelling”, that is the spontaneous passage of the electron across the barrier to the outside. This phenomenon is similar to radioactivity in which the nucleus constituents spontaneously cross the barrier that is characterised by nuclear forces, provided the barrier is not excessively higher than the energy of the component and the barrier is not too thick.

CDs are thus able to give rise to a significant electron transfer, that is very useful in biological systems where it supplies redox reactions. The probability of electron transfer is higher when CDs are completely surrounded by the non- coherent state. A striking example is provided by the huge releases of electric charge from the water droplets in the clouds lightnings. Another example is provided by recently produced special waters (Tedeschi, 2008; Andrievsky et al. , 2005 ; Katsir et al. ,2007) where the CDs are wider apart themselves than in normal water.

When this happens we are facing a battery where the coherent water represents the negative pole and functions electrochemically as the reducing agent. On the contrary non- coherent water with its solutes is the positive pole and it functions electrochemically as the oxidant agent. In normal water this phenomenon is very light, because an electron leaving a CD may end up in another CD. Things would be different, if we could excite the CDs bringing them into a state in which all electrons capable of “ tunnelling out” formed vortices originating a magnetic moment. This ensemble of CD’s could become coherent following the same dynamics that produced the coherence among the molecules. All excited CDs would thus show an in- phase movement and the corresponding magnetic moments adopt a structure so that the coherence domains experience a light mutual repulsion and fall apart.

The above theoretical predictions based on Quantum Electro Dynamics (QED) have found recently an experimental corroboration (Zheng et al., 2007). It has been discovered that on hydrophilic surfaces liquid water assumes peculiar properties, much similar to the properties predicted for coherent water. Very thick layers are formed where solutes cannot enter; this property has been checked by using fluorescent dyes. For this reason such region have been called exclusion zone (EZ). EZ water layers can be as thick as several microns (in special cases up to 500 microns) . The viscosity of EZ water is much higher than in bulk water, its density is slightly lower and its “effective temperature”, as measured by infrared thermography, is below 200 K. Moreover it is very easy to draw electrons from it producing without applying any external batteries, electric currents whose negative pole is EZ water and the positive pole is the non coherent aqueous medium.

The role of interfaces can be understood by considering that in bulk water electromagnetic and thermal fluctuations couple each other so that coherent and non coherent fractions are intimately mixed and the pattern of the coherent structure is so flickering that they have no possibility of exhibiting their properties for a time long enough to allow their detection. On the contrary the attraction by an hydrophilic surface adds up an energy term that protects CDs from the thermal assaults, stabilizing their structure. In this way interfacial water exhibits permanently all the features of coherent water. This is of paramount importance for biology. All the biological water can be considered interfacial water since the huge density of membranes and surfaces (mostly hydrophilic) existing in living organisms. We can conclude that biological water is widely different from normal water and looks more similar to the EZ water and the special waters quoted above. We will discuss elsewhere the properties of such special waters. Let us discuss now how the above results about water could help us to address the problem of the biological dynamics.

3. the role of water in living matter

A main conclusion of the above section is that a water CD is a device able to collect in the environment low-grade energy, having an high entropy, and transform it, by exciting coherent vortices of almost free electrons, into high grade energy, with a low entropy, that can reach the level of molecule electronic excitations. Let us apply the first principle of thermodynamics to a single water CD, evolving from a state 1 to a state 2 at a constant temperature T. By calling U the internal energy of the CD, S its entropy, Q the exchanged heat and W the work performed, we get:

U2-U1=Q+W=T(S2-S1)+W                  (1)

By introducing the definition of free energy F=U-TS we get:

 F2-F1=W                                          (2)

Since the coherent state has evanescent entropy, the main feature of a water CD is :

U2-U1=F2-F1=W                                 (3)

Equation 3 summarizes just the property we have expressed at the beginning, namely a CD of water is able to transform into useful work without thermal losses, the whole amount of energy it has been able to collect in the environment. Equation 3, moreover, expresses the full content of one of the principles that in 1935 Erwin Bauer (Bauer, 1935) has suggested as a basis for theoretical biology. However a major problem arises : How the CD is able to release this energy outwards? This release is not possible electromagnetically, because of the reasons given in item 3 of the previous section. This impossibility, by the way, suggests a very long life for the excited levels of the CDs. This property has been detected experimentally by some of us (Elia et al. , 2006). The only possible decay of an excited water CD is a chemical one where the excitation energy is transferred to specific non-aqueous molecules that consequently became chemically activated. The theory of electrodynamic coherence suggests a way to achieve that. A water CD has a typical oscillation frequency of 0.26 eV at T=0 (Preparata, 1995) that decreases slowly at non-vanishing temperature and can be estimated to be about 0.2 eV at room temperature. Moreover the electromagnetic field of the CD falls off exponentially out of the CD (evanescent field) . When an external molecule meets this tail of the CD field, if its frequency differs from 0.2 eV by an amount lower than kT, it is able to resonate with the CD and gets attracted inside it (Del Giudice, Tedeschi, 2008). These “guest molecules” , since they are co-resonating with the CD, become partners of the common oscillation of the water molecules and are then entitled to become members of the CD. Consequently they share the ownership of the excitation energy of the CD, so that when the amount of this energy matches the chemical activation energy of this coherent array of molecules, the full amount of energy could be transferred to them in one single stroke, as in multi-mode lasers. This energy transfer does not occur in a diffusive way, like in a non-coherent ensemble of molecules, but is driven by a field dynamics that transfers to each molecule the share of energy prescribed by the phase relationship existing in a CD, and molecules meet each other according to the co-resonance condition. The mechanism of random collisions among molecules is thus replaced by a deterministic mechanism where molecules are supplied with energy in a resonant way and meet each other within a coherent array governed by a frequency code, that becomes then a candidate to be the biochemical code. This mechanism is thus a candidate to solve the enigma discussed in the introduction and the solution implies a major role for water whose predominance in living matter acquires then a rationale.

The interplay between electromagnetism and chemistry outlined above is a possible embodiment of the pioneering suggestions of Herbert Froehlich (Froehlich,1967) and Albert Szent-Gyorgyi  (Szent-Gyorgyi, 1957) on the role of electromagnetic coherence and the water in the biological dynamics.


We thank Prof. J. Pokorny for stimulating discussions during the International Symposium “Biophysical aspects of cancer electromagnetic mechanism” (Prague, Czech Republic, July 1-3, 2008). We acknowledge also many fruitful conversations with our friends , Prof. V.L. Voiekov on the properties of liquid water in biology, Profs. L.S. Brizhik and E. Tiezzi on the self-organisation in living matter.


Andrievsky GV, Klochkov VK, Derevyanchenko LI  (2005): Is C60 fullerene molecule toxic?! Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures, 13:363-376.

Arani R., Bono I., Del Giudice E., Preparata G. (1995):  QED coherence and the thermodynamics of the water.Int. J. Modern Phys. B, 9 1813-1841.

Barbieri M. (2004): The Organic Codes. The University of Cambridge Press.

Del Giudice E., Preparata G., Vitiello G. (1988): Water as a free electric dipole laser, Phys. Rev. Lett., 611085-1088.

Del Giudice E., Preparata G. (1998): “A new QED picture of water: understanding a few fascinating phenomena” in the volume “Macroscopic Quantum Coherence”, Singapore: (eds. Sassaroli et al.) World Scientific, 108-129.

Del Giudice E., Tedeschi A., 2008, Water and the autocatalysis in living matter, Electromagnetic Biolgy and Medicine, ( submitted to).

Elia V., et al., 2005, "Hydrohysteretic phenomena of "extremely diluted solutions" induced by mechanical treatments. A calorimetric and conductometric study at 25 °C",
Journal of Solution Chemistry, , Vol. 34(8), 947-960  agosto  

Elia V., et al., 2008,  Physico-Chemical Properties  of aqueous Extremely Diluted Solutions in relation to ageing,
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 93 (3), 1003-1011

Froehlich H. (1967): Theoretical Physics and Biology In: Proceedings of the First International onference on Theoretical Physics and Biology, Versailes, 1969, M. Marois ed., North Holland, Amsterdam,  pp. 12-22.

Katsir Y, Miller L, Aharonov Y., Ben Jacob E (2007): The effect of rf-irradiation on electrochemical deposition and its stabilization by nanoparticle doping J Electrochem Soc; 154: D249-D259.

Preparata G. (1995): QED coherence in matter . Singapore, London, New York, World Scientific.

Szent-Gyorgyi A., Bioenergetics, 1957, Academic Press, New-York.

Tedeschi A., 2008, paper in preparation ,

Voiekov V. L., 2007,  Fundamental Role of Wter in Bioenergetics, in Biophotonics and Coherent Systems in Biology, eds. L. V. Belussov, V. L. Voeikov and V. S. Martynyuk, Springer, New York, 89-104,

Zheng Jian-ming et al., 2006 , Adv Colloid Interface Sci, , 127, 19-27 and papers quoted therein.

<< zurück zur Artikelübersicht

englishenglish deutschdeutsch
impressum     terms     © Copyright HeavyLight